Shell Blocks Employee Access to Activist Website

Houston, TX (October 2, 2012)

Early Monday morning, 71,010 Shell employees received an email from the company’s “Grassroots Employee Empowerment Division” providing information on Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, a pivotal human rights case being argued in the U.S. Supreme Court. The email contained links to news stories, as well as a tool to help employees tweet their feelings about the case at key US news anchors and Oprah Winfrey.

The only thing is, Shell has no “Grassroots Employee Empowerment Division,” and they don't want publicity for the case. The email was in fact the work of an activist group called People Against Legalizing Murder (PALM), who received the list of emails from what they believe to be a group of disaffected Shell employees. (A similar leak occurred two years ago by Shell employees calling for a “peaceful corporate revolution” against the company’s unsavory human and environmental rights abuses.)

Within minutes of the email being sent out, Shell blocked the site internally, preventing employees from accessing it. "I would love to participate, but access is denied to all links you sent out," wrote one employee among many who expressed concern. The 71,010 employees were informed this morning of the situation and the site's new URL.

PALM intended the action to help shine a spotlight on the case, brought by the widow of Dr. Barinem Kiobel, who was hanged along with novelist Ken Saro-Wiwa for opposition to Shell's drilling plans. Shell is alleged to have aided military forces of the Nigerian government that raided more than 60 villages, killed over 800 people, and displaced 30,000 more.

To prevail, Shell lawyers must overturn a 200-year-old law, the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), that compensates victims of international crimes. (The law has been used to compensate Holocaust survivors who sued for restitution from corporations that profited from slavery and forced labor during World War II.) Shell’s lawyers are arguing that their corporation is not subject to the ATS because it is not a person.

“When it comes to things like election spending, Shell and other corporations want to have all the rights of people,” said Sean Dagohoy from PALM. “But when accused of murder, Shell conveniently argues that they aren't a person. A ruling in their favor would be a very dangerous precedent, and would badly undermine the United States’ reputation as a place that cares about human rights. That's why we attempted to reach out to Shell employees to help get the word out.”

“Surely most Shell employees, like most people, don’t want multinationals to get away with murder and other barbarities just because it's the most profitable thing,” said Mike Bonanno the Yes Lab, which provided technical assistance for the action. "Shell needs to let its employees speak."

Contact

Sean Dagohoy
People Against Legalizing Murder (PALM)

Andy Bichlbaum
The Yes Lab